[SECURITY] [DSA 5736-1] openjdk-11 security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5736-1 [email protected]
https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
August 05, 2024 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : openjdk-11
CVE ID : CVE-2024-21131 CVE-2024-21138 CVE-2024-21140 CVE-2024-21144
CVE-2024-21145 CVE-2024-21147
Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the OpenJDK Java runtime,
which may result in denial of service, information disclosure or bypass
of Java sandbox restrictions.
For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), these problems have been fixed
in version 11.0.24+8-2~deb11u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your openjdk-11 packages.
For the detailed security status of openjdk-11 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/openjdk-11
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: [email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEtuYvPRKsOElcDakFEMKTtsN8TjYFAmawyDoACgkQEMKTtsN8
TjbQdw//SxWT8jSa26VAkBJtLN92c1Y3BJI6vHTuWJ49ywpUOGV/xuK4hAF03MfH
poDCT6immVyzUpnidZI63d2h1GYO08RvdXVZJOliywwgDf5WCPHU/e+7WR6ssJxZ
FLB1qVGmGgI5vq6X7BrTQlZ95ydlwkxTN//WM7Ey1OFzupVUg6ICJ2kNJLh/DYMn
AOEJolLKeQMgpR95/Xt+gC6o2I9xD8AotajaEvRQXkEO745bMMv2zz0JxiaEA1e3
faRII/lw2t/Sq8SlHOFaAmUBglOo45J1DRoGR5P0byYK9vnr7KxfzYj61/wgpG1y
JqLG0LqtvYnsBSmFf9HMwoS8nNEpffIvkaBAdXj3cGaTssx9AINwT+hUWrcO2+LE
XRgWYtATrtCAqik5tMxtQHIOG08XalF5KjuBwhmr0wOBAdvWcx6wkd5BJc1Tfj/s
sHDJje3LYbtTVgIuHqIR7bwt+yvpx1GqwrgAnzLN+zRn2ooPScSYbGPWhg8tUitp
xyGG4n6++ZehsJ47hXSXg2JMUlMM4IYdOCoIOVRrxAXJSlXZaeb8TSnA3tMHonkD
rw6cl+BFUU07BwfkMzePt1sTBWRzkhJj9cvmhIKvKgTDeGuGXbs0xOoG3mXC8umK
kpRl1Tun0OtsPSxYytxL9pnQPJrCclwt7OAsoUHRIbrRskcuTJ4=
=AyAA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: